EU omnibus: simplification or market disruption?

The European Green Deal 2.0 initiative was meant to be a bold leap toward sustainability, but as we all know, grand visions often collide with reality.

While its ambition to align economic and environmental goals is commendable, the execution has been less than seamless. The EU Competitiveness Compass report was a direct response to this friction—an acknowledgment that businesses cannot operate under layers of excessive regulation without sacrificing competitiveness.

As an attempt to address its own regulatory mess, the EU introduced the so-called Omnibus Simplification Package. On paper, it aims to streamline compliance, but in practice, it raises more questions than answers. For businesses and investors who have poured time and resources into preparing for CSRD, CSDDD, and the EU Taxonomy Regulation, this sudden pivot is nothing short of frustrating. How do you build long-term strategies on a foundation that keeps shifting? Without clear guidance and consistency, the risk is not just compliance fatigue but a weakening of the very sustainability goals these regulations were meant to achieve.

Counterproductive to its own goal?

The EU Omnibus Simplification risks undermining the effectiveness of CSRD, CSDDD, and the EU Taxonomy by prioritising reduced regulatory burdens over transparency and accountability. Simplifying reporting requirements may weaken enforcement, create loopholes, and encourage greenwashing, making it harder to track corporate sustainability efforts. The inconsistent application and frequent regulatory changes can lead to uncertainty, delaying ESG investments and contradicting the EU’s goal of a level playing field. While efficiency is important, weakening sustainability regulations could ultimately hinder progress toward climate and social responsibility goals, reducing trust in the EU’s ESG framework.

What we know so far, and what’s still uncertain?

As discussions around the Omnibus evolve, speculation grows. To cut through the noise, it's essential to separate confirmed measures from uncertainties.

What we know

• The Omnibus Simplification Package will consolidate and modify sustainability reporting under CSRD, CSDDD, and the EU Taxonomy Regulation.
• The aim is to reduce administrative burdens, particularly for SMEs, by eliminating overlaps and streamlining compliance.
• The European Commission recognises the need for clearer guidance and transitional measures to prevent market disruptions.
• A revised definition for small mid-caps is expected, easing compliance burdens for many businesses.
• Specific measures will simplify sustainability reporting, reducing excessive demands on smaller entities in supply chains.

What’s still uncertain

• The extent of reporting simplification—will it genuinely reduce obligations or just restructure data collection?
• How investor confidence in ESG disclosures will be maintained, ensuring comparability and data integrity.
• The implementation timeline—will changes be phased in or come abruptly?
• Whether the Omnibus will weaken sustainability reporting obligations, potentially damaging the EU’s credibility in sustainable finance.

The challenge for businesses and investors

Many companies are still implementing the original requirements, yet they may need to rewrite them before their first disclosures. This uncertainty disrupts ESG investments, assurance processes, and governance structures.

For investors, shifting rules could obscure sustainability data, risking greenwashing, mis-priced assets, and shaken confidence in ESG disclosures.

The need for stability and clear roadmaps

Cutting bureaucracy is necessary, but regulatory instability is damaging. To maintain leadership in sustainable finance, the EU must provide clarity, concrete transitional measures, and alignment with investor expectations.

Rather than constant overhauls, phased refinements based on real-world feedback would create a stable regulatory landscape. If mishandled, the Omnibus risks undermining its own objectives, weakening accountability and increasing uncertainty.

Got questions? Get in touch.